I’ve started watching this, and while the content is great, the format is not. It’s in widescreen… Now, while I love my huge 1080p, I’m PRETTY sure this footage was not shot in widescreen and I can’t even figure out for sure what they’ve done to it. Some shots look stretched, and some look zoomed. Either way, the whole thing (of the matches, at least) looks not quite right. This is ALMOST as bad as WWE’s best of raw 2009 being 4:3. WTF?!? Things should ALWAYS be in their original aspect ratio. I don’t know why studios feel the need to **** with them.
to be honest im not big fan of the match listing here. I see nothing on Dusty, but he’s mentioned on the cover. i do think they couldve done better and shouldve included more of variety instead of everything being AJ. The Luger match is great, but ther should be more matches from Hall, DDP, and Hardy. Shamrock / Sabu is great, never knew it existed.
Posted in 
Tags: 
I’ve started watching this, and while the content is great, the format is not. It’s in widescreen… Now, while I love my huge 1080p, I’m PRETTY sure this footage was not shot in widescreen and I can’t even figure out for sure what they’ve done to it. Some shots look stretched, and some look zoomed. Either way, the whole thing (of the matches, at least) looks not quite right. This is ALMOST as bad as WWE’s best of raw 2009 being 4:3. WTF?!? Things should ALWAYS be in their original aspect ratio. I don’t know why studios feel the need to **** with them.
DDP wasnt in TNA in the Asylum years.
Shaun, can i come to your house and we watch it together?
cant wait to watch this bad boy
to be honest im not big fan of the match listing here. I see nothing on Dusty, but he’s mentioned on the cover. i do think they couldve done better and shouldve included more of variety instead of everything being AJ. The Luger match is great, but ther should be more matches from Hall, DDP, and Hardy. Shamrock / Sabu is great, never knew it existed.